Nutrients to Maintain Health
One frequently hears the statement that all nutrients should come from good wholesome food. Of course they should. It is extremely difficult, however, to get good wholesome food. Certainly our over-processed, over refined American diet diluted with soft drinks, candy bars, and “quick-energy” cereals has little or no relationship to wholesomeness.
Selecting the best food available and preparing it by the best methods known are both extremely important. Selection and preparation determine the degree of health you enjoy. Food supplements may help, but food itself is far more important. Let us suppose you do obtain wholesome food and bring it into your kitchen. Losses of 60 to 100 per cent of certain vitamins and many minerals can occur during food preparation. One can predict with fair accuracy both the sickness expectancy and the life expectancy of a family by observing the wife’s cooking methods. Any man can be sure of decreasing his life span by marrying a fluffy-cake-and biscuit artist or one who does good-ole-Southe’n cookin’. The green vegetables prepared by some of these women look like the business end of a mop and taste, to me, like something a mop has picked up.
I personally know one such woman, a veritable feminine Bluebeard, who has buried three husbands from heart disease. I call it murder by the lemon-meringue-pie method. H you do wish to murder your husband, this method is excellent; no messy investigations by the police, no prisons, no loss of social prestige except among your acquaintances who are interested in nutrition. In fairness to women, however, it must be stated that many husbands commit suicide; men will continue to do so as long as the way to their hearts - often meaning their billfolds - remains the French-fries-apple-pie path.
Neither careful food selection nor preparation should he minimized. In my opinion, however, the best of both can still not assure health although the absence of either can and usually does assure illness. As I see it, we are caught in a double-squeeze play. We must have nutrients to maintain health. Most of us, however, live sedentary lives; we can use few calories. The desired nutrients come in packages with undesired calories. We cannot obtain the nutrients because we cannot use the calories; this is the first squeeze play. Because of the stresses of modern-day living, our nutritional requirements are extremely high, higher for our entire population than ever before in our history. Because our foods are over-processed and over-refined, our chances of obtaining these nutrients from foods are extremely low, lower for our entire population than ever before in our history; this is the second squeeze play. We are caught like trapped animals, and like trapped animals, we are suffering.
People are different from the experimental animals in a nutrition laboratory. Such animals are put on diets adequate in every respect except for one requirement, which may be only partially under-supplied. All other nutrients are generously supplied, their sources checked and double-checked. Even then the animals’ health gradually changes to disease, and their life span is shortened. People’s diets are often partly inadequate in from 20 to 60 nutrients simultaneously. A few nutrients may be severely lacking; others only slightly so. Just as the scientist produces ill health in experimental animals, so do people produce ill health in themselves. The principal difference is that, with these animals, illness is planned and expected; with people, illness is dreaded but expected.
Instead of the clean-cut, single-deficiency symptoms discussed in the previous chapters, persons usually suffer from multiple deficiencies, the symptoms superimposed upon each other. For example, an individual uninterested in nutrition may suffer from symptoms of a severe lack of 20 amino acids and 12 B vitamins intermingled with the symptoms of milder deficiencies of vitamins C, D, and E and of calcium, iron, iodine, and the trace minerals; during certain hours of the day the symptoms of low blood sugar may become more severe than any others. Such deficiencies, however, are not too difficult to correct.
As I see it, every day you do one of two things: build health or produce disease in yourself. There is, of course, a sliding scale ranging from the most perfect health which you as an individual can attain, through all degrees of semi-health and semi-illness to serious disease. Your choice of foods can largely determine where on this scale you will fall. Neither sickness nor health is a matter of chance.
The problem, however, is less simple than merely selecting and preparing food. The reason nutrition is not applied and may never be applied is largely psychological. We enjoy foods; our pleasures are few enough; if the only foods we feel we can enjoy are the refined and/or processed ones, we will fight to keep them, thus fighting to hold our few pleasures. We as a nation have become so malnourished that we crave sweets as an alcoholic craves drink. This craving is being bred into our children from the very day of birth when, instead of being given life-saving colostrum, the child is offered sugar water in a hospital nursery, which is soon changed to a formula often prepared from solids containing 50 per cent or more refined sugar. Later, limited budgets, radio-and-television blarings, tired mothers, kids’ parties, Girl-Scout-cookie sales, and a hundred other forces combine to perpetuate this craving for sweets. People will fight to satisfy these cravings. The cravings themselves must be prevented if health is to be built.